Democrats are railing against Trump’s $1.4 billion in crypto income. Will his financial disclosure derail a key crypto bill in Congress?
Fortune – Tech
fortune.com
Summary
President Donald Trump’s financial disclosure came at a bad time for the crypto industry—depending on who you ask. Last week, documents revealed that crypto business entities associated with Trump and his family raked in $1.4 billion in income in 2025, pushing Democrats in Congress to respond with alarm. In a post on social media, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) alleged that the commander-in-chief was “blatantly profiteering off the presidency.” (“Neither the president nor his family has ever engaged—or will ever engage—in conflicts of interest,” Anna Kelly, a White House spokeswoman, told Fortune .) Schiff and his colleagues, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), weren’t railing against Trump purely because they saw an opportunity to take political shots. (That, of course, was likely one motivation.) They were also using the moment to highlight an ongoing demand as the Senate hashes out the CLARITY Act, a key piece of legislation that would regulate digital assets. The House of Representatives passed a version of the bill in 2025, and CLARITY has now passed markup in two key Senate bodies: the Agriculture and Banking committees. But, as proponents of the bill try to whip up the 60 bipartisan votes needed to pass the legislation, Democrats are pushing for an ethics provision that would prevent the president, his family, and his associates from profiting off of crypto businesses. That’s been a repeated stumbling block throughout the negotiations, and Trump’s recent financial disclosure gives Senate Democrats more ammunition to harp on a clause forbidding the president from participating in the industry. “I think [the disclosure] can have an effect in the sense that it emphasizes the Democrats’ argument for the need for there to be an ethics deal,” said one source close to crypto policy discussions on Capitol Hill, who asked for anonymity to speak frankly. But that same source said that talks are ongoing between staffers and the bill is inching forward, even as Congress is currently in recess. Still, as the midterms approach, and the GOP’s stranglehold on Congress appears fragile, the desire for a bill remains. “The remaining three weeks in July,” said the second source, “are critical.” Ben Weiss benjamin.weiss@fortune.com @bdanweiss A consortium of more than 140 companies—including Stripe , Visa , and Mastercard —announced that it would launch its own stablecoin called OUSD , or Open USD. ( Fortune ) The tokenization firm Securitize IPOed on Thursday , despite reluctance from other crypto companies to wade into the public markets. ( Fortune ) Trump reported more income from his crypto businesses in 2025 than any publicly traded U.S. company said it earned that year. ( Bloomberg ) Investors in Trump’s memecoin have lost more than $3.8 billion trading the cryptocurrency since its launch, according to a report from Nansen . ( NYT ) Spotify cracked down on bots believed to be boosting the streams of an artist after suspicious betting activity on the prediction market Kalshi . ( FT ) Last week, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire tried to allay investor concerns over the announcement of Open USD, a consortium effort from Stripe, Visa, and Mastercard and 140 other partners to challenge the dominance of the stablecoins USDC and USDT.
From the source
President Donald Trump’s financial disclosure came at a bad time for the crypto industry—depending on who you ask. Last week, documents revealed that crypto business entities associated with Trump and his family raked in $1.4 billion in income in 2025, pushing Democrats in Congress to respond with alarm. In a post on social media, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) alleged that the commander-in-chief was “blatantly profiteering off the presidency.” (“Neither the president nor his family has ever engaged—or will ever engage—in conflicts of interest,” Anna Kelly, a White House spokeswoman, told Fortune .) Schiff and his colleagues, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), weren’t railing against Trump purely because they saw an opportunity to take political shots. (That, of course, was likely one motivation.) They were also using the moment to highlight an ongoing demand as the Senate hashes out the CLARITY Act, a key piece of legislation that would regulate digital assets. CLARITY is arguabl
Read the full article
Published by Fortune – Tech on fortune.com

