ℹ️ Informational only. This site aggregates public news and does not provide legal or immigration advice. Always verify with USCIS.gov or travel.state.gov. Full disclaimer →
NATO's new strategy relies on uncrewed vehicles, like this Hunter Wolf unmanned ground vehicle, as a first response to an attack. Spc. Mariam Diallo/US Army New documents reveal NATO is building a vast AI network to deter Russian aggression. It is part of a larger shift that foresees uncrewed systems as the first response to an attack. The strategy "does not replace tanks, artillery, fighter aircraft, or soldiers," an official said. Along NATO's eastern flank, the military alliance is no longer relying solely on tanks, fighter jets, and troops. NATO refers to this principle as "deterrence by denial." It is expected to rely on systems from Palantir and other leading Western defense contractors. The New Iron Curtain Following Finland's accession to NATO in 2023, the Alliance's shared border with Russia expanded significantly. Today, NATO's eastern border stretches from Finland through Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland to Romania on the Black Sea. It also includes the border with Belarus, Russia's close ally.
From the source
NATO's new strategy relies on uncrewed vehicles, like this Hunter Wolf unmanned ground vehicle, as a first response to an attack. Spc. Mariam Diallo/US Army New documents reveal NATO is building a vast AI network to deter Russian aggression. It is part of a larger shift that foresees uncrewed systems as the first response to an attack. The strategy "does not replace tanks, artillery, fighter aircraft, or soldiers," an official said. Along NATO's eastern flank, the military alliance is no longer relying solely on tanks, fighter jets, and troops. Instead, it is building a vast digital battlespace network made up of thousands of sensors, drones, satellites, and artificial intelligence. The goal: to detect an attack on allied nations as early as possible and block the attacker before they can penetrate deeper into Alliance territory. The concept is called the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative (EFDI). In documents obtained by BILD, one potential adversary is explicitly identified: Russia.
Read the full article
Published by Business Insider – Tech on businessinsider.com
US President Donald Trump said at a NATO summit on Wednesday that Washington will allow Ukraine to make Patriot air defence systems under licence, a move Kyiv has long sought as it faces continued missile attacks from Russia in a war now running for more than four years. Trump also said the US would “work on some kind of security package” for Ukraine, while NATO leaders pledged USD 80 billion to help meet the country’s defence needs this year and next. The summit also saw Trump shift from sharp criticism of some allies to a more positive tone by the end of the day, as NATO members highlighted higher defence spending. Alongside that, the Trump administration announced plans to remove Syria from the US list of state sponsors of terrorism, while NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte backed the latest US strikes on Iran and urged Trump to take credit for allied spending increases. Meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Ankara, Trump struck a notably warmer tone than in earlier encounters. “We’ve actually developed a good relationship. He said Zelenskyy had “done an amazing job” and been “very effective” in the war. Trump then announced a major shift in US policy on Patriots, saying, “We’ll give them the right to make Patriots. Trump had already signed an executive order in June 2025 ending several economic sanctions. However, sanctions under the Caesar Act, which target those doing business with or supporting Syria’s military, intelligence or other suspect institutions, remain in place and can be removed only through legislation. The summit brought together several strands of Trump’s foreign policy at once: support for Ukraine through Patriot production, pressure on NATO allies to spend more, backing for military action against Iran, and a fresh step towards normalising ties with Syria.
In group chats of progressive activists and political operatives concerned with the state of the Senate race in Maine Wednesday morning, a link to an anonymous Google Doc was making the rounds. It disavowed Graham Platner, the disgraced Democratic nominee whose campaign was throttled by a rape accusation on Monday, and called to replace him with Troy Jackson, a recent gubernatorial contender the document deemed “the one candidate who can hold Platner’s coalition together.” There are five days left before the deadline for Platner to get off the general election ballot in the Maine Senate race, and there is no clear alternative if he chooses to step aside. His campaign’s swift downfall has presented Democrats and his primary supporters with several bad options: The party establishment could pick a candidate and inflame an already frustrated base that scoffed at its efforts to anoint Gov. Janet Mills as the nominee, or it could bend to Platner’s demands and let him influence the selection of his successor. In either case, a base already exhausted by months of Platner scandals is at risk of fracturing and failing to consolidate behind a potential replacement — and Democrats are at risk of once again losing a key seat they need to pick up for control of the Senate to Republican Sen. Susan Collins. With so much blame and anger to go around, the fear of poisoning the selection process was on display in the anonymity of the Google Doc pushing Jackson, the Bernie Sanders-endorsed third-place candidate in Maine’s Democratic gubernatorial primary. Jackson, who has already been discussed in national progressive circles as a possible ideological successor to Platner, was first to file paperwork on Tuesday to take the candidate’s place. But the party has publicly feuded with Platner’s campaign, releasing a statement and an unusual video post on Tuesday saying that the campaign had tried “to put their thumb on the scale of what this process looks like,” after people close to Platner’s campaign told reporters that he would only drop out if he could ensure that the new candidate shared his ideological and policy stances. By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use .
