Supreme Court shifts contempt pleas on ‘bulldozer justice’ to High Courts
The Hindu – National
thehindu.com
Summary
Subscribed with another email? File photo | Photo Credit: PTI The Supreme Court of India on Thursday (July 16, 2026) passed a ‘standard order’ shifting contempt petitions alleging continued instances of ‘bulldozer justice’ to the State High Courts, reasoning it was too unwieldy to hear them all, and many would require an enquiry into facts. The judicial move comes in less than two years after the Supreme Court declared illegal demolitions conducted by States on private properties and homes, especially of people accused in criminal cases, as an “arbitrary use of power”. On Thursday (July 16, 2026), a three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said High Courts were better suited to hear petitions seeking contempt proceedings against officials for violating the November 2024 judgment. Justice Joymalya Bagchi, on the Bench, pointed out that the 2024 judgment had not specified that only the Supreme Court could hear contempt petitions. Senior advocate Huzeifa Ahmadi, for one of the petitioners, said some of the violations raised in the contempt proceedings were egregious. “Whether we could come directly to the Supreme Court depends on the facts of each case. We could come, even if it gets a little cumbersome, if the Supreme Court’s directions are being violated all over India… Ultimately, it is the rule of law which stands at a much higher footing,” Mr. Ahmadi was appearing in a contempt petition on the partial demolition of the Madni Masjid in Hata town of Uttar Pradesh. He was appearing in a contempt petition from Maharashtra. Any interim protections granted by the Supreme Court in these cases would continue.
From the source
Each one of the contempt petitions involves disputed facts which would require separate and in-depth enquiries, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant says
Read the full article
Published by The Hindu – National on thehindu.com


